How should we celebrate the research excellence obscured by the REF? The case of the Research Software Engineer

The Research Excellence Framework’s purpose is to assess world-class research. However, it overlooks the work of many groups who make possible high-quality research submissions. James Baker illustrates this through the case of the Research Software Engineer, without whom much high-quality research would not be possible, but whose contributions do not get counted by the REF. The HiddenContinue reading “How should we celebrate the research excellence obscured by the REF? The case of the Research Software Engineer”

A first look at the new categories

How do you choose which categories are needed to represent all possible research outputs? That’s the problem we’re facing at the Hidden REF. Rather than solve it ourselves, we’ve handed the problem to the research community who have much more knowledge about the range of new categories we’re going to need. In this post, I’m going to take a lookContinue reading “A first look at the new categories”

Hidden REF reveals unsung heroes

Our campaign has been picked up in Research Fortnight: “In REF2014, 97 per cent of all research outputs submitted were publications. The percentage has increased steadily with successive Research Assessment Exercises and into the REF. Publications, of course, are fundamental to the conduct of research and to academia’s contract with the public. The problem arisesContinue reading “Hidden REF reveals unsung heroes”